Value Averaging is a combination of its better-known cousin -
"dollar-cost averaging" - and a process known as "portfolio
rebalancing."
The
value averaging method, has been shown to produce better results
over time than the old "dollar-cost averaging" method. Edeleson
has tested VA using simulations to compare VA to DCA and
purchases of a constant number of shares in each investment
period. Without considering possible differences in risk,
Edleson concludes:
“There is an
inherent return advantage of value averaging (over
dollar-cost averaging and purchase of a constant number of
shares).”
“It’s about as
close to ‘buy low, sell high’ as we’re going to get without
a crystal ball.”
Edleson, who was also a managing director at Morgan Stanley
(MS), relied on one crucial piece of information that was
missing from the "dollar-cost averaging" method to come up with
"value averaging." By considering a portfolio’s expected rate of
return (something that the "dollar-cost averaging" method
neglects), the "value averaging" method helps to identify
periods of over and underperformance.
When
a portfolio is underperforming, share prices are likely to be
low. And that’s when you’ll be investing more to make up for the
underperformance. When the portfolio is outperforming your
target rate return, share prices are likely to be high. That
means it is not a good time to buy and you could even sell for a
profit, provided you maintain your predetermined average growth
rate.
Value Averaging is a nice way to ensure you follow one of the
most well known investment mandates: Buy low and sell high.
The method is particularly valuable during times of high
volatility to help ensure investors maintain discipline in their
investing. And in these difficult market conditions, it’s
certainly worth considering.
“The
rule under value averaging is simple: ... make the value not
(the market price) of your investment go up by a fixed amount
each month.”